Wondering if anyone has tried aftermarket cams on a Stock turbo GTR . Wondering results . Anyone , if so what size ?
+1 .. I would like to see results on this tooi found the alpha article . but he added meth and fmic. I am trying to see if anyone has just done a cam swap alone . I will look into labor and see if this test might be cost effective.
That might be hard to come by. The FMIC would not really "add" that much power per se. and the meth tune is no different than running race gas or E85.I am trying to see if anyone has just done a cam swap alone .
yeah but from 93 pump to adding meth could be the gain .. i really didnt want to factor in the fmic or pipes .. but adding the meth would be a big factor vs just using pump .That might be hard to come by. The FMIC would not really "add" that much power per se. and the meth tune is no different than running race gas or E85.
If you want to do cams on a stock turbo'd GTR then I would think that injectors, intakes, exahust and FMIC are in order
so the lower line is without the meth and intercooler if that help.The changes were the alpha fuel rail kit,
Aquamist methanol injection kit, AMS
induction kit w/intercooler from just
gotboost 3" intakes. So I made a few
changes that overall helped the setup but
zeroing in on one exact change isn't totally
possible. Of course the methanol injection
along with the inter-cooler really brought
more reliability to the setup. I want to do
pumps next.
Incremental labor to do the cams is very cheap in conjunction with an engine build. To do just that the cams would be massively expensive - engine R&R, remove heads, etc. My guess would be more than 25 hrs of labor. Probably not worth it as a stand-alone.i found the alpha article . but he added meth and fmic. I am trying to see if anyone has just done a cam swap alone . I will look into labor and see if this test might be cost effective.
the guys who did the Jun cams said it only took them 17 hoursIncremental labor to do the cams is very cheap in conjunction with an engine build. To do just that the cams would be massively expensive - engine R&R, remove heads, etc. My guess would be more than 25 hrs of labor. Probably not worth it as a stand-alone.
17 hours in shop rate terms you are looking at 1700-2000 in labor alone. Add another 5-7 hours and you are looking at a full engine R&R.the guys who did the Jun cams said it only took them 17 hours
Morning man,
As I said over PM the limiting factor at this point would not be the cams. If you picked up anything at all it would be VERY minor, like less power than you would get from just going with a FMIC. We have made over 1000 whp on stock cams, so what that tells me is they are flowing pretty well.
We charge 16 hours to do just a cam install with nothing else. So that means with cams and labor your investment would be 2500-3500 dollars. The cost vs. gains benefit would not be worth it at all IMO.
Hope this helps.
Very different then the Evo for sure. You will start seeing restriction on an Evo with stock cams @ 400 whp if not less.Totally different than the evo's I guess. On the Evo a good set of cams stock turbo was a significant gain. Maybe the gtr cams just need more testing to get a better grind for more power. It's still relatively new platform to where extensive testing hasn't been done yet. IMO