Lol motec alone costs more than the cost to go full bolt onThink it’s going to come down to the aftermarket - who is going to take the risk at this point.
Sad situation if a bolt on car has to move to Motec.
Lol motec alone costs more than the cost to go full bolt onThink it’s going to come down to the aftermarket - who is going to take the risk at this point.
Sad situation if a bolt on car has to move to Motec.
Even if they do it won't help you because every copy of access tuner is bound to the serial number that was registered with the ap serial number when then EFI University course was done. You cannot use that copy on any other access port serial number.Does anyone have an installer of the 2.2.1 version?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh. Well that sucks lol. So I did my tune with Churchs automotive here in s cali and I just wanted to back up my files on my pc instead of only on the ap in case I ever need to switch. I blocked the apmanager app with windows firewall and disabled auto updates. I’m hoping trying to back it up won’t cause issues.Even if they do it won't help you because every copy of access tuner is bound to the serial number that was registered with the ap serial number when then EFI University course was done. You cannot use that copy on any other access port serial number.
Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
Ecutek is following suite but only for US based tuners/cars. Complete BS.Cobb is based in US. Texas i believe.
Ecutek is based in UK.
Doesn't matter if you're grandfathered, the new software updates will force the updated things to throw codes I'm sure EcuTek will do something similar as Cobb.I heard Ecutek was purchased last year by a US based company. Thought I saw it on here.
Glad to be grandfathered, gotta rethink the whole sale now.
Compliance isn't just black and white so I'm hopeful someone (not necessarily the parent company of Cobb or Ecutek) will figure out other ways of complying with current EPA guidelines. Not trying to turn this discussion political but the current administration has another 18+ months in office. Could a change in administration change what the EPA deems a priority in enforcement?Tobin Sinclair
Hi everyone, there is a lot to discuss here and to understand how we can make our software compliant is going to be a big job. But I'll try to simplify what I know at this point in time: If our software is used to tune a car that is located in an area where the EPA has jurisdiction, then the software used will need to be compliant. So if a tuner is located in Europe but is tuning a car that is located in the US, then the EcuTek software they use will need to be compliant. Likewise, if the tuner was located in the US. If however the tuner is located in the US but tuning a car that is located outside of an area over which the EPA has jurisdiction, then the software used does not have to be compliant. So tuners located in the US tuning a car in Canada can use the non-compliant software. What exactly defines compliance and how we make the above work, in reality, is what the consultation period is for.
Sorry, by grandfathered I mean I have no reason to need a new tune. As long as I don’t update the AP then try to reflash the car I won’t have a single issue. I’m at the limits of Cobb anyways so won’t need a revision.Doesn't matter if you're grandfathered, the new software updates will force the updated things to throw codes I'm sure EcuTek will do something similar as Cobb.
This is wishful thinking. These enforcement actions started under the previous administration.Compliance isn't just black and white so I'm hopeful someone (not necessarily the parent company of Cobb or Ecutek) will figure out other ways of complying with current EPA guidelines. Not trying to turn this discussion political but the current administration has another 18+ months in office. Could a change in administration change what the EPA deems a priority in enforcement?
I wonder if the firmware update process we sometimes encounter when connecting to the bluetooth Ecutek adapter from the phone app will do anything to tunes created prior to these changes.
Wishful thinking, always, because there's a chance.This is wishful thinking. These enforcement actions started under the previous administration.
I had to sign a waiver for the tune on the NSX.Why not just offer 2 tunes: One that complies with all their nanny regulations, and one for off-road use?
Make the end user sign a waiver stating that their vehicle will only be used for off-road applications, and the company washes it's hands of any liability.
So how's that affecting a regular user tund via Cobb AP 007 ?!
Like shouldn't we update our software whenever there's some popping on?! lol
I'm pretty sure i understand it incorrectly!
When your tuner hits save on the ROM, all DTC’s will get toggled on. You have about 11 days to work out things like pump priming time. Or any other trivial change…A variation on this question...
If I go to my tuner to make a small change to my existing SD MAP (such as increasing preliminary start-up pump time; something not related to emissions, for an example of my question)...and if the tuner has the new "hobbled" software...will my MAP be hobbled in any other way (perhaps accidentally)?
Alexd
I want to be very sure that I understand your explanation:When your tuner hits save on the ROM, all DTC’s will get toggled on. You have about 11 days to work out things like pump priming time. Or any other trivial change…
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk